Being able to use just one powder for various applications is a great benefit. This standardization can let you maintain your powder evaluate loaded with the exact same powder, make bulk powder buys additional equitable, and customarily make your lifetime much easier. A person wonderful instance for pistol loaders is Winchester W231 and Hodgdon HP-38 (the exact same […]

So now I'm a tad puzzled regrading the bullet style and which load details I need to be utilizing. Could I make use of the load information with the Sierra 125gr FMJ for my 124 grain x-treme copper plated bullets?

Yep, when I bought the HP 38 it had been due to the fact I heard it had been the same as 231. In incontrovertible fact that Hodgdon experienced renamed 231 to HP38. But since I'm getting ready to load it and trying out details I see both shown on some bullet web-sites as if they have been two fully distinctive powders.

ADI is very specific While using the wording inside their Powder equivalents desk NOTE! Nowhere are the terms "a similar or equal" as lots of Wire posters have stated - like on your own!

So I ended in with the LGS and the only handgun powders they'd was W231 and HP-38. What a coincident or more possible from your similar batch. I went Along with the W231

Cleaner than Titegroup and Superior in functionality.  Not as economical even though, because you have to have slightly additional powder in the case, and the cost of HP38 is a bit much more.    This is a wonderful quicker burning powder, great.

Lead will get swiped onto the forcing cone in the majority of every revolver tho to various degrees. You didn't mention any foremost during the barrel so bullet healthy is probably excellent there.

Maybe explainable due to the fact they didn't then have a PV set up and were being location masses by inspection in the creation firearm. And experienced someone gun with dimensions not easily showing "force symptoms". There are some other spooky hundreds in Speer textbooks from People days.

Acquiring one which is as versatile together with getting cost-effective and fewer smoky with Forged is offering me grief. I come across a person that appears fantastic for 40 and see that it's actually not a sensible choice for 9... I believe I might try Energy Pistol following.

Now…considering several a submit on employing these two milsurp powders…and knowing that I normally use heavier bullets for my three hundred WinMag’s.(180gr to 190 gr Sierra BTHP) and 168gr bullets while in the seven RemMag’s….I’m hoping these will operate as sought after.

Really don't feel lousy it took me a pair yrs to figure out the 110/296 detail. I used to be considering different manuals wondering they both equally looked very good. Sceeeech !

It truly is truly just the alternative .... a fast burning powder only usually takes one/2" of bullet travel to fully burn up up And so the bullet practically coasts out from the muzzle in a slow velocity.

I do not Consider your dilemma is connected with the use of HP38/231 but instead the hardness of the commercially manufactured bullets.

Been taking pictures lead bullets On this revolver for an incredibly while.My hp-38 powder key load is thirteen grns of 2400 underneath the same precise bullet only it can be eighteen bhn.haven't any difficulties with major with this load.operates pretty cleanse.looks You will find a balancing act when taking pictures Forged bullets.sizing pressure and hardness.i dont Possess a dimension concern or i might have troubles way prior to now.I feel i have a stress difficulty.the foremost appears to be sprayed onto throughts and forcing cone.two items I ponder about.one of a kind and hp38/231 are incredibly shut on burn level chart and im loading these at 5grn one of a kind hp-38 powder and 3.5 hp38.appears grn wieght might be smaller with melt away prices this near.